Thursday, 21 August 2014

Week four- So who's paying for all this free content?

Australian journalism in the 21st century has undergone change; the kind of change that flips the industry on its head. New technology has really shaken things up. News media has an increasing level of convergence and an ever-shrinking workforce. Traditional journalism methods are struggling financially with so much free content available via the Internet. There’s news on our twitter feeds, Facebook updates, apps on our IPhones, not to mention almost every news publication hosts a website full of their content in digital form. For the most part, this information comes to no cost for the consumer, but in the midst of the digital age, this is undermining the financial security of the journalism industry. Like the uncomfortable moment at the end of a first date, who pays?

With writing as my strongest self-proclaimed talent, the death of the humble newspaper is an area I find fascinating. Newspaper circulations are in a steady state of decline, with online versions stepping in to take their place. Online papers are easily accessed, don’t blow around in the wind and, [for the most part] free, hence the massive public appeal. There have been numerous experiments to see how creating a successful business model for online journalism in the developed world pay (Blackhurst 2014). Pay walls, subscription models and paying for apps on tablets have all been trialed but we are yet to find a truly successful business model to capitalize on the popularity of online news (Blackhurst 2014). The problem lies with the fact that online content has always traditionally been free, and consumers are simply not prepared to pay for it.

As a result of all this, “budgets for high quality news have been slashed” (Blackhurst 2014, p. 55).  According to Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA) report ‘Life in the Clickstream’ (2008) over 70% of Australian print news journalists surveyed by Essential Media reported an increased workload due to the cutting of staff in their place of work. Because of this, almost 40% of these workers agreed that the quality of their journalism had suffered due to an increased workload (MEAA 2008, p, 12-13). So we are seeing less writers writing more. Jobs are harder to come by, and those journalists who are employed are burdened with massive workloads. No longer are you simply a writer, but an editor, reporter, photographer, social media expert and a whiz with technology to publish your story digitally. Online content is on the up but the financial security of the journalism industry is going down, and this has caused many institutions to consider making news consumers pay for online content.

But should consumers pay? Should journalists pay in terms of their jobs and workloads? Or should the quality of content pay? This is the age-old question facing journalism in the digital age. Personally, I believe that consumers should pay as journalists provide a service. Whether paying for a printed newspaper or a digital one, in order for news to be of high quality and serve its purpose (to inform the people of the people), the industry needs to run as a successful business. In retrospect, the cost of news for consumers is minimal anyway, as advertisements pay the bulk of production costs.

As students, the future of journalism is a scary thought. Jobs are scarce and journalism as we traditionally know it is changing. Whether the web will see the demise of newspapers or not is up in the air. To finish, here’s a quote from The Age journalist Adam Carey, who is witnessing the changes first-hand (as cited in Lamble, 2011): “Journalism is going through an enormous metamorphosis due to innovations in online communication, and I don’t think anybody knows what it will ultimately look like when it’s over. Newspapers… are feeling the pressure as much as any. Already there are fewer journalists here than there was three years ago when I arrived. Despite this, I still feel confident newspapers will continue to exist as long as they can give readers a high quality product. But they may become smaller and more specialized.”

References:

Blackhurst, C. (2014). Finding Viable Business Models for Developed World Print and Online Newspaper Sectors. In P. J. Anderson, M. Williams & G. Ogola (Eds.), The Future of Quality News Journalism: A Cross-Continental Analysis (pp. 55-66). New York: Routledge.

Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance. (2008).  Life in the Clickstream: The Future of Journalism. Retrieved 20 August 2014, from https://uonline.newcastle.edu.au/courses/1/CRS.110356.2014.S2/content/_2378386_1/foj_report_final.pdf

Lamble, S. (2011). News as it happens. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.







No comments :

Post a Comment